Lower than an hour after the Home Ethics Committee printed their in depth report on the elected fraudster from New York, Con(gress)man George Santos took to Twitter to say that he won’t be operating for a second time period subsequent 12 months. Don’t consider him. Don’t consider something this schnook says, since all the pieces is a lie.
Solely when petitions for the June main are filed in April and Santos doesn’t submit will his absence from the poll be actual. Until he pleads responsible by then, he’ll nonetheless be a free man, as his federal prison trial on Lengthy Island begins in September. However there’s a great probability he gained’t be a member of Congress and we’ll must cease calling him con(gress)man.
Not that Santos will resign (and quit the $174,000 authorities wage and medical protection), however his disgusted colleagues maybe will expel him, perhaps as quickly as they return from their Thanksgiving break. However they need to not undo the 2022 election till Santos has been discovered responsible in a court docket of legislation or by the Ethics Committee.
Regardless of documenting many misdeeds together with his marketing campaign funds, the committee didn’t render a judgment or suggestion past to “publicly condemn” him. There is no such thing as a normal Assertion of Alleged Violation that they all the time use to advocate punishment by the total Home, which might vary from being reprimanded or reproved.
We all know why they punted, as to not intrude with the continued prison case. However the course of issues vastly. Even press statements from Ethics Committee members calling for Santos’ expulsion isn’t the identical factor because the bipartisan panel voting that means.
We have now mentioned from final December, when it was uncovered by the press (belatedly) that Santos wasn’t a Jew, or a former banker or ever enrolled in faculty and his exploits and biography have been all lies, that he ought to resign, however mendacity isn’t a criminal offense.
Quickly sufficient prosecutors began trying and so they discovered many crimes to cost him with. And the ethics panel additionally dug and printed their findings. However expenses aren’t guilt.
If the precedence is getting Santos out of Congress, then the Ethics Committee ought to have formally urged his expulsion. That they didn’t does make a distinction. The members searching for his ouster (led by different New Yorkers) have already tried twice to get the two-thirds majority and so they might succeed the subsequent time. However they should do not forget that they write the legal guidelines for the nation and doing it precisely proper is essential.
Having Santos discovered responsible by the courts or the Ethics Committee must be the usual.
We don’t need this man disgracing the already disgraceful Congress any longer than he has, however there can’t be any shortcuts. The Home has solely ever expelled 5 members: three traitors from the South who took up with the Confederacy towards the Union when the Civil Struggle began in 1861 and a pair of criminals following their convictions on felony expenses in federal court docket in 1980 and 2002.
Santos is a liar and a awful bum and is more likely to be nailed for his many offenses, but it surely hasn’t occurred but. Even for such a horrible man, you continue to must observe the principles to kick him out, similar to you’d for everybody else.