MORGANTOWN – Public opposition continues to a proposal by Mon Energy and Potomac Edison to vary the best way they credit score house solar energy prospects who contract for internet metering.
In the meantime, the businesses have voiced objection to a proposal by a gaggle of vitality and client advocacy teams to vary the best way they’re requesting the change.
And the businesses on Thursday answered a query from The Dominion Put up about an obvious battle within the two methods they’re approaching photo voltaic vitality manufacturing – utility manufacturing versus house manufacturing.
Internet-metering prospects generate all or a portion of their very own energy, sometimes by means of photo voltaic, and obtain credit on their invoice for any energy they generate in extra of what they use.
At present, the businesses present a full 1-to-1 credit score, which means vitality given to the utility is price the identical as vitality purchased from the utility. The present residential base price is about 11.4 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh), and will go as much as about 13 cents as the businesses’ a number of price instances attain their respective conclusions.
The businesses suggest to vary that to base the credit on the wholesale price for electrical energy, which the filings calculate at 6.6 cents per kWh – roughly half of the 13 cents per kWh.
As of Thursday afternoon, the state Public Service Fee had obtained 609 letters of protest towards the proposed change. Whereas most are batch-submitted type letters, some come from people, together with three submitted this week.
One buyer stated he’s an current net-metering buyer and shall be grandfathered in underneath the present credit score construction, however he opposes it as a result of the funding in putting in a system is substantial; he’ll take 15 years to pay again his funding. He additionally has to pay a month-to-month primary price to Mon Energy even when he has a credit score stability.
“If we actually as a rustic need to transfer towards cleaner vitality we have to assist the person who invests within the options,” he stated. “The present clear vitality options can not provide all of the vitality wanted and we nonetheless want these vitality corporations to stability and fill the hole that different vitality sources depart. Slightly than giving people an unfair value on the alternate of vitality there needs to be a greater manner.”
Whereas the businesses have to make a revenue, he stated, “Don’t do it on the backs of the few who’re making an attempt to assist transfer ahead to cleaner vitality.”
A second buyer stated, “FirstEnergy [the companies’ parent company] ought to give attention to serving to its personal prospects keep their financial savings moderately than specializing in benefiting out-of state-investors. West Virginia is an vitality state and will embody renewable vitality obs and financial savings in its identification as an vitality powerhouse.”
The third, from Fairmont, stated she has labored within the photo voltaic trade for nearly seven years and has .helped tons of of households go photo voltaic – a life-changing transfer as the realm’s electrical payments have risen sooner than the nationwide price.
Her household is planning to construct a brand new, solar-powered house, However, “with out the one-to-one internet metering that we have now now, we, like so many others will depart the state of West Virginia. … I’m not positive why you’ll need to handicap an precise rising trade within the state. This coverage is making an attempt to choose winners and losers within the state of West Virginia, please simply let photo voltaic play on the even enjoying subject.”
Navigating the request
As we’ve reported, the confusion comes as a result of the proposal is included in two separate price instances: an ENEC case the place they request a price hike to cowl their expended internet vitality prices, and a normal price case that features buyer fees for infrastructure and for his or her vitality help program.
West Virginia Citizen Motion Group, Photo voltaic United Neighbors and Power Environment friendly West Virginia filed a movement with the PSC earlier this month to strike the net-metering dialogue from the ENEC, which they are saying is the mistaken venue to contemplate the proposal.
The businesses created the issue, they are saying, by initiating the dialogue of shifting to a wholesale-based credit score within the normal price case however then defining that price within the ENEC case.
The three teams say that, other than some authorized issues related to splitting the proposal, proscribing it to the final price case could be extra environment friendly and fewer complicated for all events in subsequent litigation.
The businesses argued on this week’s submitting that their motion just isn’t complicated. The ENEC case, they stated, is about vitality costs and is the precise place to debate wholesale charges. Additionally, after they filed the bottom price case in Might, the overview interval used to calculate the businesses’ prices to supply electrical energy had not ended, so they might not have calculated the wholesale price at the moment.
And, they are saying, wholesale vitality costs are sometimes not mentioned in base price instances. Lastly, because the opposing teams oppose any change within the credit score construction, the wholesale value is irrelevant and it doesn’t matter the place the businesses talk about it.
House photo voltaic vs utility photo voltaic
The businesses have obtained PSC approval to construct three solar-power amenities – together with one outdoors Morgantown adjoining to Mon Energy’s Fort Martin plant – and are awaiting OK on two extra.
We posed to the businesses a query concerning the seeming contradiction: selling solar energy they generate whereas, in keeping with the various protests, discouraging house photo voltaic; and that some view this as evidencing an curiosity within the backside line greater than in solar energy itself.
They responded that their photo voltaic program was created to help a state legislation handed in 2020 supposed to assist meet the state’s electrical energy wants whereas additionally fostering financial progress. The legislation permits electrical utilities to personal and function as much as 200 megawatts of renewable vitality amenities. (As we’ve reported, it additionally says the net-metering cost could not cross-subsidize between totally different teams of consumers, and the credit score should be supplied at truthful worth.)
They stated many corporations now require a portion of their electrical energy to come back from renewable sources. “Our 5 utility-scale photo voltaic amenities will contribute to assembly this demand and supply renewable selections for purchasers that haven’t been out there previously.”
They concluded: “We need to make clear that we’re not discouraging internet metering. We’re dedicated to equity for all our prospects. At present, internet metering prospects don’t pay for our era capability, transmission or distribution programs. Which means that non-net metering prospects are overlaying the prices for each their very own utilization and that of net-metering prospects. We’re working to make sure a good stability for everybody.”
Electronic mail:[email protected]