Earlier this month, Kanawha County Sheriff’s Deputies have been referred to as to a house in Sissonville to research a report of suspected little one abuse. After they arrived, deputies made a surprising discovery — two younger youngsters locked in a small shed. One other little one, a 3-year-old, was alone in the home.
The youngsters locked within the constructing had been disadvantaged of enough meals, water and clothes or a working bathroom. “I used to be repulsed for lack of a greater time period,” Deputy H.Okay. Burdette mentioned. “As quickly because the door was opened, the warmth from inside hit us. The scent … it was horrible. Simply the situation of the shed was devastating.”
The youngsters’s adoptive mother and father, Donald Ray Lantz and Jeanne Kay Whitefeather, weren’t residence when police got here. They arrived a number of hours later and have been arrested. They’re now in jail on felony little one neglect expenses.
Media talked with neighbors who mentioned they’d referred to as the state workplace of Baby Protecting Providers (CPS) to complain, however nothing occurred. West Virginia Watch reporter Amelia Ferrell Knisely contacted neighbor Stacy Miller who mentioned she referred to as CPS quite a few instances, however “Nobody ever contacted me.”
West Virginia Watch additionally reported that on the day the youngsters have been eliminated, Candice Hilbert referred to as 911 and mentioned, “There’s a household now we have referred to as CPS on a number of instances … she has two children locked in an outbuilding. They’ve been in there for days.”
West Virginia Watch, MetroNews and different media have adopted up with CPS for extra info, however all requests about how the company dealt with the complaints have been denied. The company insists that it’s prohibited by state legislation from releasing particulars of its circumstances.
“WV Code 49-5-101 prohibits the West Virginia Division of Well being and Human Sources (DHHR) from offering any info on youngsters,” the company mentioned in a press release.
The media are usually not asking for details about the youngsters; they need to know what the company did or didn’t do. The legislation referenced by DHHR is meant to guard youngsters, not the company, from public disclosure.
Whereas we’re quoting state code, take into account 29B-1-1: “Authorities is the servant of the folks, and never the grasp of them. The folks, in delegating authority, don’t give their public servants the correct to determine what is nice for the folks to know and what’s not good for them to know.”
In equity, as I’ve famous many instances, our state’s CPS employees have extraordinarily tough jobs. They’re usually underpaid and overworked. There are normally many vacancies, which improve the caseload of workers. We require them to enter tough and typically harmful properties to make sure youngsters are protected from abuse and, when obligatory, take away youngsters from unsafe situations.
Notably, on its web site CPS encourages residents to name once they suspect abuse or neglect utilizing the 24/7 hotline at 800-352-6513. The company is required by legislation to comply with up inside 72 hours. The anecdotal experiences recommend CPS didn’t do this on this case, however who is aware of?
Possibly CPS employees did go to the Sissonville home and the adoptive mother and father have been capable of cowl up the abuse. Or possibly CPS dropped the ball. Both method, the general public has a proper to know. If there was a failure associated to a staffing scarcity, then that’s necessary info for public policymakers.
DHHR’s insistence on hiding behind its overly broad interpretation of state legislation serves no function apart from to gasoline suspicion about what the company doesn’t need the general public to know.